Digital Engineering 24/7

Helping design and engineering professionals discover, evaluate and specify technologies and processes that shorten the design cycle and enable success.

The Changing Face of Parametric Modeling

Latest Design News

Latest Design Resources

By Kenneth Wong  

December 23, 2009

Push-pull editing -- commonly found in direct modeling programs like SpaceClaim, CoCreate, and Siemens products with Synchronous Technology -- has now been embraced by many leading parametric CAD brands. Despite having Parametric for its first name, PTC or Parametric Technology Corp becomes the latest to implement push-pull functions. This appears in the company's flagship Pro/ENGINEER Wildfire 5.0 software under the name Dynamic Editing.

Originally, the distinction between parametric and direct modelings seemed straightforward enough. If a CAD system let you construct and modify geometry by preserving a feature history, it was a parametric modeler. On the other hand, if it let you create and edit geometry on the fly -- in other words, directly in 3D space -- without bothering to record the process in a series of steps, it was a direct modeler. Regardless of the type of program you were using, you would most likely be executing your commands via menu bars and dialog boxes.

Now that you have the option to directly push, pull, poke, and pinch on surfaces and edges to reshape your geometry in both parametric and direct modeling programs, direct modeling may become a muddled term, up for grab, open to misinterpretation. At best, it risks confusion.

While many leading parametric CAD modelers have made it possible for you to directly interact with your geometry as described above (SolidWorks, Alibre Design, and Pro/ENGINEER, to name but a few), some direct modelers like Kubotek's KeyCreator continues to use an interface that relies on menu bars and dialog boxes instead of push-pull modeling. Yet, it creates and edits geometry without keeping a history tree, so strictly speaking, it's a direct modeler.

If merging parametric and direct modelings into a single package (something Autodesk is publicly pursuing via Autodesk Inventor and Inventor Fusion) becomes the future of CAD, the distinction between history-based (or parametric) modeling and history-free (or direct) modeling might just become history -- a moot point. Instead, you might care more about whether you can push and pull on your parts.

To illustrate my point, here's a CAD blind test.

 

Latest in PTC

About Kenneth Wong

Kenneth Wong

Kenneth Wong is Digital Engineering's resident blogger and senior editor. Email him at [email protected] or share your thoughts or suggestions at digitaleng.news/facebook.

Follow DE
on Facebook
on Linkedin

Related Topics

Design   ​CAD   Resources   Virtual Desktop   News   Autodesk Inventor   Direct Modeling   ProENGINEER   PTC   All topics
 

Subscribe

Subscribe to our FREE magazine, FREE email newsletters or both!

Join over 90,000 engineering professionals who get fresh engineering news as soon as it is published.

Subscribe today

 
 

From our Sponsors

Meltio Takes Metal Additive to the Next Level
Meltio's DED technology enables industries to tailor and customize their solutions to create & repair metal parts.
Easing the Transition from ETO to CTO with Configuration Lifecycle Management
Manufacturers are discovering that the Configure-to-Order (CTO) model provides significant benefits when it comes to customization.
Siemens + Altair = The Next Chapter in Design and Simulation
With its acquisition of Altair, Siemens creates a unified simulation portfolio combining generative design with high-performance computing and AI workflows.