Digital Engineering 24/7

Helping design and engineering professionals discover, evaluate and specify technologies and processes that shorten the design cycle and enable success.

CubeSat Challenge Winners Announced

CubeSat Challenge Winners Announced
The winning CubeSat design, named the FoldSat, offers an estimated 40% savings in production time. Courtesy of Stratasys.

Latest Design News

Latest Design Resources

By John Newman  

August 31, 2015

CubeSats are the next generation vehicle for space research. About the size of a Rubik’s Cube, the small satellites are packed full of electronics and released into space. The cost of a producing and launching a CubeSat is a fraction of that required of larger satellites, making them perfect for any research team on a tight budget.

In May, GrabCAD and Stratasys (now the same company), announced a GrabCAD challenge to design the most practical possible 3D printed shell for CubeSats. The CubeSat Challenge was opened to anyone interested in designing for additive manufacturing, with prize support offered by Stratasys. Winners of the challenge were recently announced.

The winning CubeSat design, named the FoldSat, offers an estimated 40% savings in production time. Courtesy of Stratasys. The winning CubeSat design, named the FoldSat, offers an estimated 40% savings in production time. Courtesy of Stratasys.

The challenge drew over 200 respondents, many of whom were apparently already familiar with some of the design principles that makes additive manufacturing (AM) a growing presence in the aerospace field. One such advantage is the complexity of design afforded by AM, which allows for part consolidation.

“Engineers were able to reduce satellite structures from up to 50 parts down to two or three parts by using additive manufacturing,” said Scott Sevcik, business development manager for aerospace and defense at Stratasys. “There were a number of very creative approaches to redesigning the satellite structure, and it was great to see several of the entries consolidate the build down to two or as few as one part. That highlights one of the most significant benefits of 3D printing a structure.”

Such a large reduction in part count can offer significant advantages to production. It can reduce the cost of assembly labor by cutting time required to build a part. Fewer parts means reduced chance of assembly error, or a delay caused by a shortage of a single part. Along with the other benefits, reducing the number of parts also shortens the supply chain.

The overall winner of the CubeSat Challenge was Paolo Minetola from Italy. Minetola produced a design he named the “FoldSat” consisting of two parts and meant to be produced by Fused Deposition Modeling. Each part of the design consists of three faces. The faces fold up into half a square and are joined to the second half through simple snap mechanisms.

The interior of the design contains rails to assist with mounting electronics, and once assembled, a single side of the finished CubeSat can be swung open to allow access to the interior.

You can learn more about the other winners here.

Below you’ll find a video outlining the first interplanetary space mission to include CubeSats.


Source: Stratasys

 
 

From our Sponsors

Meltio Takes Metal Additive to the Next Level
Meltio's DED technology enables industries to tailor and customize their solutions to create & repair metal parts.
Easing the Transition from ETO to CTO with Configuration Lifecycle Management
Manufacturers are discovering that the Configure-to-Order (CTO) model provides significant benefits when it comes to customization.
Siemens + Altair = The Next Chapter in Design and Simulation
With its acquisition of Altair, Siemens creates a unified simulation portfolio combining generative design with high-performance computing and AI workflows.