U.S. Department of State to Move Against 3D Printed Guns

As additive manufacturing (AM) continues to move from an expensive tool used solely by big businesses to a technology everyone can use and afford, there are bound to be some stumbling blocks. It’s unfortunate that one of the biggest of those blocks is also connected to a hot button issue.

3D printing became part of the national discussion about gun control following the successful firing of the “Liberator” designed by Cody Wilson of Defense Distributed. Wilson, a self-described crypto-anarchist, quickly found his design and his company under fire from the U.S. Department of State which issued an order to remove the plans from his website.

Although Wilson complied with the order, he launched a lawsuit against the government agency claiming the order violated his rights to freedom of speech. Regardless of Wilson’s suit, the U.S. Department of State has begun to move ahead with stricter rules regarding the availability and legality of electronic files that can lead to the unauthorized production of firearms.

The new regulations come in the form of a number of revisions to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), the most important of which is a change to definition of arms export. The updated rules would classify export  as any attempt to, “… remove activities associated with a defense article's further movement or release outside the United States … including any technical data posted on the Internet.”

While it may seem ridiculous to attempt to ban something that already exists on the Internet (ask Hollywood how hard it is to find pirated copies of movies), codifying the ban offers some advantages. The new regulations would give the government a tool to prosecute offenders, leverage to pull down new designs and provide at least a modest deterrent to design dissemination.

The move is also probably the only option for the U.S. Department of State to do something about the problem. Even with the support of lawmakers such as Senator Chuck Schumer, it seems like any attempt at new gun control legislation is doomed to failure. With the congress either unwilling or unable to step up, the agency has taken the lead.

It also might be tempting to think that 3D-printed guns aren’t much of a threat. For now, that idea is generally correct. The “Liberator” is nearly as likely to injure its user as its target, but as AM becomes more widely available that will change. Metal additive processes have already proven to be capable of producing a fully functional, metal gun.

Below you’ll find a video about 3D-printed firearms.

Source: US State Department