Digital Engineering 24/7

Helping design and engineering professionals discover, evaluate and specify technologies and processes that shorten the design cycle and enable success.

A Design-Validation-Production Workflow for Aerospace Additive Manufacturing

By Anthony J. Lockwood  

November 10, 2016

Sponsored ContentDear DE Reader:

Uncertainty, thy mother is assumption. Today's Check it Out link takes you to an in-depth technical white paper that describes a design, analysis and physical testing workflow that can help you cull out uncertainties in simulation models, optimize designs and raise your confidence in your models.

The title “A Design-Validation-Production Workflow for Aerospace Additive Manufacturing” may lull you into assuming this paper is solely for aerospace people. Yet if you design, analyze and test part robustness in any industry, you can map this paper to your requirements easily.

The thesis is that 3D printing is used for one-offs, small-lot parts and for parts difficult to make with traditional manufacturing processes. The digital-to-physical link that 3D printing offers means you can design your model and 3D print a part that meets stringent requirements.

Traditional workflows, however, rely on simulations that use the uncertainties inherent in your design assumptions. Prototyping tests those assumptions late in the cycle, which tends to jack up costs and time with rework. The solution the paper offers is to measure simulation accuracy during the mid-stages of your design cycle using a process called CAETestbench. It seems an interesting and elegant solution.

Every element of the engineer workflow and toolkit appears to play a role in this paper: CAD, material databases, FEA (finite element analysis), topology optimization, inter-application connectivity, documentation and generating revised solid geometry from optimization concept results. A key is leveraging 3D printing then validating simulation accuracy mid-way through development rather than prototyping near the end of the process.

What this means is that CAETestbench has you 3D-print parts with the exact materials and process you assume the final part will use. You subject that part to the strains and stresses it must handle until deformation. You then use a component called Digital Image Correlation with a solver like Altair's OptiStruct to compare the deformed physical part with your simulation-predicted failure to validate your solver's ability to model the 3D part correctly.

This Digital Image Correlation (DIC) image shows a comparison of measured strains and the predicted strains from an OptiStruct FEA (finite element analysis) model. Image courtesy of Altair Engineering Inc. This Digital Image Correlation (DIC) image shows a comparison of measured strains and the predicted strains from an OptiStruct FEA (finite element analysis) model. Image courtesy of Altair Engineering Inc.

The paper steps you through the CAETestbench process from material modeling, simulation, 3D printing, validation and optimization. Well-known engineering tools come and go as the project progresses. Rich technical details, images and tables broaden the discussion every step of the way.

“A Design-Validation-Production Workflow for Aerospace Additive Manufacturing” is a winner. Hit today's Check it Out link, download your copy and then compare it to your workflow. Well worth it.

Thanks, Pal. – Lockwood

Anthony J. Lockwood

Editor at Large, DE

 
 

From our Sponsors

Meltio Takes Metal Additive to the Next Level
Meltio's DED technology enables industries to tailor and customize their solutions to create & repair metal parts.
Easing the Transition from ETO to CTO with Configuration Lifecycle Management
Manufacturers are discovering that the Configure-to-Order (CTO) model provides significant benefits when it comes to customization.
Siemens + Altair = The Next Chapter in Design and Simulation
With its acquisition of Altair, Siemens creates a unified simulation portfolio combining generative design with high-performance computing and AI workflows.